Thursday, 1 August 2013

Embedding Employability Skills in University Programmes



Much has been said in the media over the last few years about the large number of graduates from our universities who are unable to find jobs. Not surprisingly, universities and other institutions of higher learning have taken the brunt of the criticism with accusations that the present content of higher education is no longer relevant to workplace needs. The University of East London’s (UEL) reform of its academic programmes attempts a solution to this most pressing issue in higher education, of what a university education is all about?

The UEL approach is innovative in that it integrates a university-designed skills curriculum into all its academic programmes. The approach overcomes a common tendency both within and outside the university to regard employable skills as being outside the university's educational processes. The UEL approach is a response to official pressure on universities generally to take greater responsibility over the employment readiness of their graduates. Universities across UK are now compelled to ensure the personal development of students through a set of carefully defined skills that is woven into the fabric of the curriculum regardless of the selected discipline.

Typically, the skills curriculum covers three areas - academic learning, employability skills and research methods. Academic learning skills will be a taught module at the first level whereas the other two skills will be placed one each at levels 2 and 3 of a programme of study.

Although only one of the three skill sets refers expressly to employability, other two skill sets are no less relevant to students' career needs. Learning is no longer a rite of passage; it is now a lifelong requirement in the New World of changing opportunities. Learning to learn is as important as skill as the others to set the young graduate on a path to build a career. Research is also a skill that is conspicuously absent in many undergraduates. What is often not clear to young graduates is that research is not simply an academic exercise but a vital function of business and for personal development. Including research skills as an essential part of the general academic curriculum would highlight its importance to higher education learners.

UEL regards the new skills curriculum as "an entitlement for our students’. The designers of the new approach say that it has been designed to ensure that students are taught, have the opportunity to practice and are assessed in skills for academic learning, employability and research."

What is really interesting about UEL’s solution is their recognition that employability skills may already be etched in most modules or subjects that constitute a programme; it is just that they are not always understood or seen as ‘employability skills’. Part of the university’s efforts will therefore be to make employability skills embedded in other subject subjects explicit to students and staff and impress on them that these skills too form part of the learning outcomes. It will be a function of module leaders and lecturers to identify these aspects of the course to the students. More than that, curriculum designers are now expected to map out and list the different skills found in a programme as part of the information that is shared with students.

The UEL reform has the virtue of not only being timely but of creating a new brand of university education that will make it more acceptable to employers and meaningful to students. It is a design that local universities could usefully look into in putting together their own solutions or to simply implement whilst their own solutions are being finalised.

Tuesday, 30 July 2013

Private Higher Education in Malaysia




The way private colleges in Malaysia expanded capacity in post-secondary education is a story of innovation and foresight that has led to a whole redefinition of university education, not only in this country but worldwide. From their traditional and limited role as providers of ‘second-chance’ education at the secondary level and basic commercial education to school-leavers, they rose to become half-way institutions for a university education overseas and eventually, even without the status of university, to offer full university programmes from foreign universities locally. 
The growth of the private sector owes all to the powerful demand for higher education in the country and the inability of public institutions to meet that demand. That demand still drives the private sector. The public craving for higher education will not be curbed by policy limitations or economic shortcomings that limit university places. This in turn will fuel the further development of the private sector.
The private sector was already entrenched as a viable provider of higher education even before proselytization by international agencies moved the government to divest its responsibilities in higher education to the private sector. The hallmark of the decision to privatize higher education is manifested in legislation passed in 1996 and 1997 that included the Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 – an Act that liberalized official attitudes to the establishment of higher education institutions.
Today, the private sector accounts for more than half the students enrolled in tertiary institutions. Malaysia’s profile as a destination for students from other countries is no less significant –it has become the 9th or 10th most popular destination of foreign students.
More recently, the idea of becoming a hub for regional higher education, an idea made possible by the vibrant private sector has drawn some of the most recognized universities in the world to occupy and plow the space cleared by private institutions over the last five decades to recruit students from this region.
This Blog hopes to examine the development of private higher education from the watershed legislation of 1996 to the present against the background of tensions emerging from national higher educational policies and official political attitudes to the establishment of private educational institutions.
 Some of the themes that will be pursued in the Blog;
1.      Development of tertiary education in the post-independence period up to the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 and the policies underlying that Act.
2.      Government policy and reactions to private higher education
3.      The role of private post-secondary educational institutions in the post-war period and their role as innovative (Twinning et all) providers of higher education.
4.      The case of the Medeka University application, the ensuing litigation and the impact of the application on the establishment of private universities.
5.      Policies and legislation on higher education:
6.      The impact of private institutions on socio-economic policies on education.
7.      The ambivalent nature of private higher educational institutions.
8.      Academic autonomy in private institutions and regulatory controls.
9.      The sustainability of the growth and the future of local private institutions in in the liberalized environment.