The recent unfortunate demise of an international student in
the custody of the Immigration Department created only the slightest ripple in
the higher education domain. The deceased student’s university posted a notice
of his death, a few students demonstrated outside the Nigerian Embassy, but
that was about all that happened in a sector that has more than 100,000
international students. Unless I missed them, there were no expressions of
concern from our universities and colleges or from student or staff bodies or
from the many associations of universities and colleges.
Deaths in custody are not frequent occurrences, but even one
death, when set against a background of regular student complaints of
harassment by the authorities should cause enough concern among
institutions to initiate some firmer actions to deal with the matter. If the existing system for the centralized management of international students is not
functioning efficiently to prevent the wrongful detention of students, it is time to
jettison it for one where there is an obligation on detention centers to
contact the institution where the subject student is registered. Information on
the centralized system is meant to be available to all enforcement agencies to
help them verify the status of international students. That information should be enough to avoid improper detentions of students. If the system is not
functioning to its purposes or worse still is not being relied upon by the
enforcement agencies, these factors must be addressed by those who created
the system and are responsible for its management.
UNESCO statistics show that annually, there are over 5
million students circulating the globe looking for a place to learn outside
their own countries. Malaysia which is at number 10 in the UNESCO list of
countries drawing incoming students, brought in more than 120,000 foreign
students in 2016. Associations representing local educational institutions urge
the government to grow the number of inbound students because of their
contribution to the economy. Each student, they assert, contributes at least
RM50,000 a year to the local economy, more than the average tourist and a great
deal more than the foreign worker who sends out a part of his earning. A Government Report published in 2009 entitled, Strengthening Private Education in Malaysia also
focuses on the economic value of the student in private institutions.
The value of international students lies not simply in the
money they bring into this country or that they support the development of our
education sector. International students add value to our social and cultural
systems. They link us with distant communities, transform our classrooms and
make international citizens of our students. The international student must
leave this country not only with his scroll but with the memory of being
amongst a friendly and kind people. It will be a terrible loss to this country
and its people if they stop coming here because they fear for their safety.
Leaving aside the potentially negative economic impact and reputational damage resulting from this custodial death, what does it say about the enforcement agencies who without exception are strict followers of “compassionate Islam” - the variety now promoted by Mujahid , the country’s Minister for Islamic affaires?
ReplyDeleteDidn’t he raise expectations of a friendlier governmental interface in contrast to the previous one stained by almost (officially cited) 300 custodial deaths between 2002 and 2016?